The Shining Path: Primary Source Materials (Peru)

La Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM) custodia, a través de su sistema de bibliotecas (CEDOC), colecciones documentales sobre la violencia política en Perú (1980-2000), incluidos materiales sobre Sendero Luminoso. Estos archivos, digitalizados y accesibles, documentan el conflicto armado, el impacto de las acciones del PCP-SL y la historia universitaria.
  • Contenido: Los documentos incluyen fuentes primarias sobre el accionar de Sendero Luminoso y la respuesta del Estado.
  • Contexto Histórico: San Marcos fue un escenario complejo durante el conflicto, documentándose incluso la presencia de lemas senderistas en aulas universitarias en la década de 1980-1990.
  • Acceso: El material se encuentra disponible para consulta en la biblioteca digital de la UNMSM tras un proceso de curación y digitalización conjuntos con instituciones internacionales.
  • Este fondo es fundamental para el estudio del conflicto armado interno y de la memoria histórica en el Perú.
Documenting the Peruvian Insurrection contiene materiales de fuentes primarias que arrojan luz sobre varias peculiaridades importantes de la guerra peruana. El más horrible de estos es que aproximadamente la mitad de los asesinados fueron víctimas del Partido Comunista del Perú - Sendero Luminoso, o PCP-SL, un pequeño grupo maoísta en gran parte desconocido al comienzo de su lucha armada para la mayoría de peruanos y los organismos de inteligencia del Estado. Debido a la gran cantidad de sus víctimas, así como la crueldad de sus acciones, el PCP-SL es un caso único en el estudio de conflictos internos en América Latina”.
Colección Documental sobre la violencia política en el Perú

The National University of San Marcos (UNMSM), through its library system (CEDOC), safeguards documentary collections on political violence in Peru (1980-2000), including materials on the Shining Path. These digitized and accessible archives document the armed conflict, the impact of the PCP-SL’s actions, and the university’s history.

Folletos de Sendero Luminoso
En defensa de los acuerdos revolucionarios de la V Conferencia
Serie: Folletos políticos
01/02/1966

New Book by Diego Pirillo

Cover

The Atlantic Republic of Letters offers an alternative intellectual history of early America. Focusing on Benjamin Franklin’s Philadelphia, the book frames Euro-American colonialism as an intellectual enterprise, which was established not only through military and economic means but also through books, ideas, and cultural institutions.

Through research in dozens of archives and rare book libraries, Diego Pirillo brings together two interconnected histories. First, he recovers the place of British America in the cosmopolitan world of the Republic of Letters, studying the communication system that facilitated the transatlantic circulation of knowledge. Second, he shows that knowledge was weaponized in the effort to survey and control North America. While fashioning themselves as independent and cosmopolitan scholars, Franklin and his associates, including James and Martha Logan, Isaac Norris II, Pierre Eugène Du Simitière, and Jane Colden, among others, were in fact deeply tied to political power and tailored their ideas to the needs of their patrons. They served as agents of empire and helped to devise and put into practice the colonial project. Not only were books, libraries, and cultural institutions funded by the wealth created by the slave trade and the expropriation of Indigenous land, but, as Pirillo argues, the very taxonomies and classification systems that Euro-American scholars devised directly shaped the colonial enterprise.

In this respect, The Atlantic Republic of Letters illuminates the relationship among books, intellectuals, and colonial governance, and explores the ways in which knowledge circulated and shaped conquest.

[from publisher’s site]

Diego Pirillo (Ph.D., Scuola Normale Superiore) is Professor of Italian Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, where he is also affiliated with the History Department. His work explores how mobility, displacement, and colonialism shaped the intellectual and cultural history of early modern Italy, Europe and the Atlantic world. He has a secondary interest in modern Italian intellectual history with special attention to authors such as Croce, Gentile and Gramsci. His previous book The Refugee-Diplomat: Venice, England and the Reformation (Ithaca, Cornell: University Press, 2018, was awarded the 2019 MLA Aldo and Jeanne Scaglione Prize for Italian Studies. The Refugee Diplomat offers an alternative history of early modern diplomacy, centered not on states and their official representatives but around the figure of “the refugee-diplomat” and, more specifically, Italian religious refugees who forged ties with English and northern European Protestants in the hope of inspiring an Italian Reformation.

The Atlantic Republic of Letters : Knowledge and Colonialism in the Age of Franklin.
Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2026.


Collection Development: Latin American Films Database: Pragda Complete Film Collection

Pragda Complete Film Collection

PRAGDA features 500+ Latin American, Spanish, and Latinx streaming films/series, showcasing diverse voices and perspectives from over 30 countries in their original languages with English subtitles.

Pragda Complete Film CollectionThis link opens in a new window UCB access onlyPRAGDA features 500+ Latin American, Spanish, and Latinx streaming films/series, showcasing diverse voices and perspectives, from over 30 countries, in their original language with English subtitles.
Pragda Complete Film Collection

 

The Pragda film database is a comprehensive streaming platform specializing in Latin American, Spanish, and Latinx cinema. It offers a curated collection of over 700 films from more than 30 countries, all presented in their original languages with English subtitles or captions. The database is widely used by universities, libraries, and cultural institutions to provide access to award-winning documentaries, feature films, and series that cover a broad range of themes—including social issues, history, culture, feminism, immigration, and international politics.

Pragda provides educational resources such as discussion guides, filmmaker Q&As, and customizable streaming options, making it a valuable tool for academic and institutional markets. Films in the collection are available with Public Performance Rights (PPR) and Digital Site Licenses (DSL), allowing easy integration into curricula and public screenings. The platform is accessible via institutional subscriptions, and many films are also available for individual licensing.


International Collaboration (VŠE Prague, UT Austin, UC Berkeley) Builds Agentic AI System for CIA FOIA Archives

International Collaboration (VŠE Prague, UT Austin, UC Berkeley) Builds Agentic AI System for CIA FOIA Archives

Prague / Austin / Berkeley — A new international research collaboration has developed and tested a multi-stage “agentic AI” system capable of extracting structured historical knowledge from large, unstructured digital archives. Using declassified CIA documents as a case study, the research demonstrates how artificial intelligence can help transform thousands of pages of scanned archival material into a coherent, time-resolved narrative, making Cold War-era intelligence reporting significantly more accessible for the wider public.

The study, published in The Electronic Library, focuses on one of the most dramatic turning points in modern European history: the Prague Spring reforms and the subsequent Soviet-led invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. By applying AI-driven processing to the CIA’s FOIA Electronic Reading Room, the team shows how today’s large language models (LLMs) can support the systematic reconstruction of historical reporting, while also highlighting the continued need for expert human oversight to preserve nuance, accuracy, and interpretive integrity.

This makes the research immediately useful not only for historians, but also for institutions deciding how to deploy AI responsibly at scale: libraries, archives, universities, and even public sector organizations managing large document collections.

A Collaboration Across Three Institutions and Disciplines

The project brings together expertise from three leading academic environments:

Prague University of Economics and Business contributed primarily to the design of the agentic workflow, the methodological framing of the solution, and the evaluation of the models, including the comparison of metrics, the analysis of the CIA FOIA Reading Room entity data structure, and the resulting information-ethical questions.

The University of Texas at Austin provided expert context in geopolitical and historical studies, which enabled grounding the case study and interpreting the results within the history of the Cold War.

UC Berkeley contributed a perspective from information science and librarianship, including work with digital collections and archival processing practice, which strengthened the applicability of the workflow for digital archives, libraries, and research organizations focused on history.

This cross-disciplinary cooperation reflects a growing reality: solving “big archive” challenges requires not only technical innovation, but also domain expertise and information science know-how.

From 2,122 Pages to Usable Knowledge: What the System Achieved

The research introduces an eight-agent workflow designed to mirror the real tasks historians and intelligence researchers face when working with archival material. The system was applied to 201 President’s Daily Brief documents, spanning January 1968 to January 1969, totaling 2,122 pages from the CIA’s FOIA Electronic Reading Room.

The AI pipeline produced three key outputs:

  1. A month-by-month narrative summary of intelligence reporting on Czechoslovakia
  2. A structured list of key named entities (people, organizations, events) organized chronologically
  3. A thematic quantification of reporting, measuring how much attention was given to political, societal, economic, and tactical military topics

To reduce noise and improve relevance, the system used OCR (optical character recognition) and automated filtering. Out of more than 1.37 million characters extracted via OCR, the pipeline isolated 265,550 characters of relevant intelligence content, achieving an extraction rate of 19.3%—meaning over 80% of raw text was correctly removed as irrelevant metadata or unrelated content.

Why This Matters for Society

This research tackles a quiet but serious societal problem: massive collections of historically valuable documents exist but remain effectively “locked away” because they are not machine-readable or searchable in meaningful ways.

Many declassified archives—especially scanned collections—are technically accessible but practically unusable without months (or years) of manual work. By introducing a replicable agentic workflow, the study shows how AI can:

  • expand access to historical primary sources
  • reduce routine work (searching, cleaning, extracting, organizing)
  • support transparency and democratic access to government records
  • enable deeper analysis of geopolitical crises through time-resolved narratives

The research is grounded in the democratic logic behind the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA): that an informed public is essential for a functioning democracy. In this context, AI becomes more than a productivity tool—it becomes a method for scaling public understanding of complex historical events.

A Key Message: AI Helps, But Experts Still Matter

A central conclusion is clear and responsible: fully automated historical analysis is not yet feasible without risk. OCR errors, model instability, and interpretive ambiguity remain real challenges.

The authors emphasize the need for human-in-the-loop workflows, where AI accelerates extraction and structuring, while experts validate, interpret, and preserve historical nuance.

In other words: AI can carry the heavy boxes—but humans still need to read the labels.

Main Takeaways

This research offers a practical and forward-looking message for archives, universities, and society:

  • Agentic AI can turn unstructured archives into structured knowledge
  • Large language models can support digital humanities at scale
  • Model selection must be based on measurable trade-offs (quality, cost, speed, stability)
  • Human oversight remains essential for credibility
  • The approach is replicable beyond Cold War history, and can be extended to other FOIA collections and geopolitical contexts

About the Publication

The study was published in The Electronic Library under the title:
“A multi-stage agentic AI system for extracting information from large digital archives: case study on the Czechoslovak year 1968 in CIA’s FOIA collection.”

Reference: Černý J, Avramov K, Pendse LR (2026;), “A multi-stage agentic AI system for extracting information from large digital archives: case study on the Czechoslovak year 1968 in CIA’s FOIA collection”. The Electronic Library, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2025-0272


New Book by Debarati Sanyal

cover

Arts of the Border: Fugitive Bodies at Europe’s Edges investigates the consequences of unfolding catastrophes across the world and the displacement they continue to produce. Through recent narratives and media representations of the refugee “crisis” at Europe’s edges, it tells a new story about those on the move, the technologies unleashed on them at borders, the racialized and colonial histories that inform these technologies, and the artistry with which migrants and allies bear witness to displacement. The book reorients us toward the creativity and movement of migrants themselves– their “arts of the border”—as well as toward the political force of the arts that represent them, whether in literature, documentary film, or art installations.

Sanyal proposes kino-aesthetics as a framework for capture and fugitivity at borders. From kino—to set in motion—and aesthetics— relating to sensory perception—kino-aesthetics conveys the force of bodies in motion and the image in its circulation. The book examines the simultaneity of capture and escape at thresholds of illegalization, from airport detention zones to Calais’s “jungle” and the Euro-African border at Ceuta and Melilla. What emerges throughout these case studies is a portrayal of border violence in its racial and colonial forms as well as an archive of refusal, fugitivity, and un-bordered imagining.

[from publisher’s site]

Debarati Sanyal is Director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Critical Inquiry and Professor of French (affiliated with Critical Theory, The Center for Race and Gender, and European Studies). Debarati’s research and teaching interests range from 19th-century French literature to contemporary critical refugee studies. Her first book, The Violence of Modernity: Baudelaire, Irony and the Politics of Form (Johns Hopkins, 2006), reclaimed Baudelaire’s aesthetic legacy for ethical inquiry and historical critique. Her second book, Memory and Complicity: Migrations of Holocaust Remembrance (Fordham, 2015), addressed the transnational circulations of memory and complicity in the aftermath of the Shoah, from post-WWII to the present. It was translated in French as Mémoire et complicité: Au Prisme de la Shoah (PUV, 2018) with a preface by Éric Fassin. A Guggenheim Fellow (2021-2022), she  is completing a book on migrant resistance, biopolitics and aesthetics in Europe’s current refugee “crisis.”

Arts of the Border: Fugitive Bodies at Europe’s Edges. New York: Fordham University Press, 2025.


Call for Papers for the Central Asian Studies Conference

Central Asian Studies Society, University of Chicago                                           
6031 S Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, US   cass.uofc@gmail.com

Call for Papers for the Central Asian Studies Conference
 
We are excited to announce the Central Asian Studies Conference at the University of Chicago, organized by the university’s Central Asian Studies Society and taking place on April 17–18, 2026.
About the Conference. Throughout Central Asia, embodied culture is expressed through art and culture: oral traditions, written poetry and literature, textiles, music, and many other media. Creative acts and works have been intertwined with collective experiences ranging from celebrations to invasions to revolutions, working to represent and shape memory and identity. Our conference centers reflections on art, music, oral traditions, literature and other cultural practices as not only objects of study, but also as sources of inspiration, tangible connections to the past and means to understand the present. We are creating a space for young researchers interested in matters of culture and identity to meet, learn about, and learn from each other.
Call for Papers. We are now accepting abstracts of papers, mainly from graduate students, but also from postdoctoral fellows, faculty members, and independent scholars. We invite historians, linguists, anthropologists, art historians, literary scholars, sociologists, musicologists, and scholars of religion whose work engages with Central Asia—conceived broadly: from the Mongolian Plateau in the east to the Urals in the west, from Afghanistan in the south to the Altai Mountains in the north—between late antiquity to the present.
We particularly encourage submissions related to this inaugural conference’s theme: “Voices through Art and Culture: Identity Formation in Central Asia, from Music to Architecture.” What can art and culture tell us about the process of identity formation? What is the relationship between culture and politics? How were the responses to historical events that affected the whole of Central Asia, in political, ecological, economical realms differ and take shape in the forms of art and culture? How does art and culture reflect Central Asianness, whether as a unified identity and/or a condition of great diversity and difference?
In the current political climate of instability globally and in the region, this Conference aims to delve into the historical practice of artistic and cultural responses and help us investigate the current time – how is identity being transformed and reflected in modern art and cultural traditions? We believe that, especially in at such a time, it is important to look back at the roots of the identity and reevaluate it. And there is no better tool for that than looking into Art and Culture.
Keynote Speakers: The keynote speakers for the Conference are a distinguished scholar of ethnomusicology Professor Theodore C. Levin and a prominent artist from Kazakhstan Gulnur Mukazhanova.
Dr. Theodore C. Levin, Arthur R. Virgin Professor of Music at Dartmouth University, author of the book The Music of Central Asia. Theodore Levin is a longtime student of music, expressive culture, and traditional spirituality in Central Asia and Siberia. Levin served as the first executive director of the Silk Road Project, founded by cellist Yo-Yo Ma. His research and advocacy activities focus on the role of arts and culture in international development, and on the preservation and revitalization of musical heritage.
Gulnur Mukazhanova, a distinguished artist born in Kazakhstan and based in Berlin, who weaves together Central Asian heritage with contemporary artistic enquiry. Through textiles and symbolic materials, she evokes layers of cultural and historical memory. Her works unfold as dialogues between suppressed traditions and today’s shifting realities, reflecting on postcolonial experience, feminism and globalization. Her recent solo exhibitions include Bosağa – Transition. The Weave of Ancestral Memory at the Tselinny Center of Contemporary Culture, Almaty (2025); Öliara: The Dark Moon at Mimosa House, London (2022); and The Space of Silence at Aspan Gallery, Almaty (2021).
Submissions. Please send submissions electronically to caconferenceuofc@gmail.com no later than Sunday, February 1, 2026. Please include your name, institutional affiliation, program of study or position, a 250-word abstract, and a tentative title. If you are unsure about the suitability of your topic, please feel free to email us at the above address. Applicants will hear back from us by late February 2026.
Selected papers will be grouped into panels of three. Participants should be prepared to deliver a 20-minute presentation, followed by a led Q&A discussion. Written papers must be circulated to the discussant and fellow members of the panel at least two weeks before the conference.
Limited funds for travel will be available to presenters without access to institutional funding. Please indicate if you are interested in being considered for this funding in your email.
Please circulate this widely! For questions and accessibility concerns, please write to caconferenceuofc@gmail.com.
A performance by the Tuvan music trio Alash, also organized by the Central Asian Studies Society and taking place in Rockefeller Chapel, will conclude the conference.

La Hora (Uruguay) on Sitios de Memoria Uruguay

La Hora is an essential primary source for scholars of Latin American political and economic history. This period marked a decline in Uruguay’s historic democratic stability — marked by high inflation, government, crackdowns on leftist political movements. La Hora offers a unique lens on the political conditions that led to significant social changes in Uruguay. “Sitios de Memoria Uruguay” has digitized forty-two issues of La Hora from 1984 to 1989.

This website is an independent initiative by the Sitios de Memoria Uruguay collective, supported by organizations central to the struggle for memory, truth, justice, and reparation.
This website is an independent initiative by the Sitios de Memoria Uruguay collective, supported by organizations central to the struggle for memory, truth, justice, and reparation.

The site description is as follows,” La Hora (diario cooperativo) fue un diario vinculado al Partido Comunista del Uruguayo, pero a la que se integraban periodistas de otros sectores del Frente Amplio. Sus números se publicaron entre 1984 (aún en dictadura) y 1989, año en que se fusionó con El Popular. De esa fusión surgió el diario “La Hora Popular”, publicado entre 1989 y 1991. El antecedente inmediato a la aparición de “La Hora” fue la publicación “Cinco días”, editada durante solo 4 semanas entre marzo y abril de 1984 hasta su clausura.

La Hora tuvo suplementos temáticos, como “La Hora sindical”, “Liberación” y “La Hora Internacional”. En los casos en que la publicación completa pudo obtenerse, estos suplementos se presentan integrados dentro de un mismo archivo. Cuando solo pudo conseguirse los suplementos, se presentan separados.”

Below is the landing page of the newspaper archive.

La Hora serves as a critical primary source for scholars analyzing Latin American political and economic history. During this era, Uruguay’s longstanding democratic stability eroded, characterized by soaring inflation, state suppression of leftist movements, and the emergence of the Tupamaros.
La Hora serves as a critical primary source for scholars analyzing Latin American political and economic history. During this era, Uruguay’s longstanding democratic stability eroded, characterized by soaring inflation, state suppression of leftist movements, and the emergence of the Tupamaros.

 


REECAS Northwest, the annual ASEEES northwest regional conference , April 16-18, 2026

REECAS Northwest 2026

The 32nd Annual Conference for Russian, East European and Central Asian Studies

April 16-18, 2026

University of Washington

Seattle, WA USA

Deadline: January 9

REECAS Northwest, the annual ASEEES Northwest Regional Conference for Russian, East European and Central Asian Studies, welcomes students, faculty, independent scholars, and language educators from the United States and abroad.
REECAS Northwest, the annual ASEEES Northwest Regional Conference for Russian, East European and Central Asian Studies, welcomes students, faculty, independent scholars, and language educators from the United States and abroad.

REECAS Northwest, the annual ASEEES northwest regional conference for Russian, East European, and Central Asian Studies (REECAS) will take place April 16-18 at the University of Washington in Seattle, WA.

The REECAS Northwest Conference welcomes students, faculty, independent scholars, and language educators from the United States and abroad. Proposals on all subjects connected to the Slavic, East European, and Eurasian regions are encouraged. The conference hosts panels on a variety of topics and disciplines including political science, history, literature, linguistics, anthropology, culture, migration studies, gender studies, LGBTQ studies, film studies and more.

Established in 1994, REECAS Northwest is an important annual event for scholars and students in the Western U.S., Canada, and beyond. This interdisciplinary conference is organized by the University of Washington’s Ellison Center for Russian, East European, and Central Asian Studies.

The REECAS Northwest Conference welcomes both individual paper proposals and also panel/roundtable proposals. Individual proposal submissions will be grouped into panels with a common theme.  To submit your proposal, please submit a 250-word abstract and abbreviated C.V. using the form on the REECAS Northwest Conference webpage: Call for Proposals Form: REECAS NW 2026 – Fill out formDeadline January 9th, 2026. 

Questions? Please email cereas@uw.edu with any questions not answered on the conference webpage.


New Open Access Resource in Eastern European and Slavic Studies: Estonia Digital Archive (1991-2009)

We have access to a fully digitized daily newspaper from Estonia (1991-2009) aimed at Russian-speaking citizens of Estonia.

Following Estonia’s independence in 1991, the Tallinn-based Russian-language broadsheet Estoniia was launched. Built by the staff of the former Sovetskaia Estonia, it stood out as one of the country’s pioneering private media outlets. The paper took inspiration from Western journalism, focusing its reporting on global and local politics, financial trends, and the arts. Under the financial patronage of Vitaly Khaitov, the publication grew significantly and rebranded as Vesti dnia in 2004, though it eventually folded in 2009 due to economic challenges and a competitive market.


Crossing Paths in San Francisco’s North Beach: Weston, Rivera, Kahlo, Pflueger and Stackpole

Proof prints depicting Diego Rivera (left) and Timothy L. Pflueger sitting on a bench in the outdoor studio of sculptor Ralph Stackpole in San Francisco, taken by Edward Weston.
Unfixed proof prints, each depicting Diego Rivera (left) and Timothy L. Pflueger, taken by Edward Weston at the outdoor studio of sculptor Ralph Stackpole in San Francisco on December 14, 1930. From Edward Weston Portraits from the Timothy L. Pflueger Papers (BANC PIC 2013.119).

On December 14, 1930 the photographer Edward Weston, then based in Carmel-by-the-Sea, drove to San Francisco to take portraits of a few clients, including the prominent architect Timothy L. Pflueger, who was then overseeing his firm’s remodel of the San Francisco Stock Exchange Building in the city’s financial district. The sitting with Pflueger took place at the North Beach studio of sculptor Ralph Stackpole, whose massive figurative pieces were commissioned by Pflueger to adorn the facade of the Exchange. Coincidentally residing with Stackpole at the time was Mexican artist Diego Rivera — also commissioned by Pflueger, to create a mural inside the Exchange. Accompanying Rivera was his young wife, the artist Frida Kahlo, who was early in her career and not yet known outside of Mexico. Weston was already acquainted with Rivera after having worked for a spell in Mexico City, where he befriended the artist and took his portrait in the mid-1920s. The crossing of paths of these creative luminaries at Stackpole’s studio is richly documented in Weston’s daybook entry for this date. (See The Daybooks of Edward Weston, vol. 2, pages 198-199; published by Aperture in 1973.)

The Pictorial unit of The Bancroft Library’s archival processing team is pleased to announce that some of the portraits taken by Weston at this sitting have been recently processed and are now available for access (described in the library catalog under the call number BANC PIC 2013.119). Separated and transferred from the Timothy L. Pflueger Papers of our Manuscripts unit (BANC MSS 2012/182), the collection of Weston materials includes a letter written by the photographer and a selection of small-format proof prints offered to the architect so that he could choose the images he preferred for final printing. Among the thirteen prints in the collection, eleven of them depict Pflueger in various shoulder-length poses, while two images depict the architect informally sitting on a bench with Rivera. Stackpole is not depicted, but evidence of his open-air studio is present in the natural light reflected on the subjects’ faces and some of the objects captured in the shots of the architect and muralist seated together. Although Weston took separate portraits of Rivera and Kahlo at this same encounter, these images are not present in the material sent to Pflueger.

Weston’s letter to Pflueger, written by hand on the photographer’s studio stationery, refers to the specific images from the sitting that he feels were best, yet also admits to his being unsatisfied with the overall results and offers the architect the option of a second sitting. The collection also includes Weston’s original envelope in which the letter and prints were sent, the wrapping materials in which Weston enclosed the prints, and Pflueger’s annotated file envelope in which the material had been saved.

Manuscript material pertaining to Edward Weston's correspondence with Timothy L. Pflueger.
Front page of letter from Edward Weston to Timothy L. Pflueger, written December 15, 1930; with the original postmarked envelope and Pflueger’s file envelope in which the letter and associated photographic prints were stored. From Edward Weston Portraits from the Timothy L. Pflueger Papers (BANC PIC 2013.119).

The proof prints that Weston sent to Pflueger were unfixed — i.e. after being exposed to the negative and placed in a bath of developer, the prints did not undergo a subsequent chemical bath which would have “fixed” the development of the images at a given point. The images therefore continued to gradually develop and are, in their current state, predictably faded and darkly discolored. The practice of not fixing such proof prints was common among 20th century portrait photographers whose work involved traditional gelatin silver “black & white” processes. In addition to serving as quickly produced reference images for both photographer and client, the inferior-quality prints also helped to ensure that the proofs sent to clients for final selection would have minimal resale value — an obvious concern for prominent photographers whose works were collected on the market.

Some of the prints in the collection display additional deterioration as a result of having been stored in direct contact with the chemically harmful foil and acidic paper in which they were wrapped for decades prior to their arrival in the library. On the backs of the prints are pencil-written annotations by Weston, including numbers that indicate the sequence of poses he photographed. On the back of one print Weston’s initials indicate an image which he considered to be among the most suitable for final printing.

Portraits of Timothy L. Pflueger.
Unfixed proof prints depicting San Francisco architect Timothy L. Pflueger, taken by Edward Weston at the North Beach studio of Ralph Stackpole on December 14, 1930. While both were stored in the same stack of prints likely for decades, the print on the left has undergone additional deterioration after prolonged immediate contact with acidic wrapping materials, and/or other detrimental environments. From Edward Weston Portraits from the Timothy L. Pflueger Papers (BANC PIC 2013.119).

To ensure safe access by researchers, the prints have been individually enclosed in polyester sleeves that prevent any unfixed chemical residue from migrating during their handling. As a safeguard against long-term damage caused by exposure to light, each print is additionally housed in a paper sleeve. Each of the components of the collection is housed in a separate folder, and all are stored together in a single box.

The Bancroft is excited to make this material accessible for a number of reasons, the most obvious being its evidentiary connection to a moment in time when Weston, Pflueger, Rivera, Kahlo and Stackpole came together for a professionally and socially satisfying gathering, one documented for posterity by the photographer in both word and image. Weston’s distinct large handwriting is impressive to behold in person, as are the pieces of stationery which conveyed the contents from photographer to architect. Perhaps the collection’s most enduring value lies in its glimpses of Weston’s working methods, his relations with his clients, and his openly frank assessment of the quality of his work.

To more broadly illustrate the context of the collection, we have supplemented the original material with printouts of high-quality scans of contact prints made from Weston’s original negatives taken at Stackpole’s studio on that day. Compared to the proofs in the Pflueger papers, these clear, sharp images depict the full range of portraits of Pflueger, and additional shots of Rivera, including one depicting him with Kahlo. We’ve also included a copy of the pages in Weston’s original daybook entry that describe the photographer’s various appointments and observations of that day, most of it expressing his affectionate reunion with Rivera, his first impressions of Kahlo, and the group’s dinner outing in North Beach that followed the sitting. These supplemental materials were kindly shared by the Center for Creative Photography of the University of Arizona, Tucson, where Edward Weston’s archive is held.

Diego Rivera (left) and Timothy L. Pflueger sitting on bench in San Francisco studio of sculptor Ralph Stackpole.
Contact print of an Edward Weston portrait of Diego Rivera (left) and Timothy L. Pflueger, taken at the San Francisco studio of Ralph Stackpole on December 14, 1930. (Courtesy of Center for Creative Photography, University of Arizona, Tucson.)
Frida Kahlo (left) and Diego Rivera, at the San Francisco studio of sculptor Ralph Stackpole.
Contact print of an Edward Weston portrait of Frida Kahlo (left) and Diego Rivera, taken at the San Francisco studio of Ralph Stackpole on December 14, 1930. (Courtesy of Center for Creative Photography, University of Arizona, Tucson.)

Among the Pflueger papers are other photographs of Rivera and Kahlo – not taken by Weston – including two snapshots which may depict the couple during one of their stays in San Francisco. These can be found in BANC MSS 2012/182, carton 33.

Artists Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo standing on a balcony.
Frida Kahlo, with Diego Rivera in image at left, on sunlit balcony, unidentified location. From the Timothy L. Pflueger Papers (BANC MSS 2012/182, carton 33).

Of related interest, Bancroft’s holdings of the San Francisco News-Call Bulletin Photograph Archive include original glass negatives of studio portraits of Rivera, Kahlo and Stackpole taken at a single sitting. The photographer, location and exact date of these portraits are unknown, but they were undoubtedly taken during the couple’s same stay in San Francisco, between late 1930 and mid-1931, when Weston visited them for the Pflueger sitting. These portraits are found in BANC PIC 1959.010–NEG pt. 1, box 3135 (items 37390 and 37391) and box 3136 (items 37404 and 37405).

Mural artist Diego Rivera (left) and sculptor Ralph Stackpole, taken during a studio portrait sitting.
Diego Rivera (left) and Ralph Stackpole, 1930 or 1931. Photographer unknown. From the San Francisco News-Call Bulletin Photograph Archive (BANC PIC 1959.010–NEG pt.1, box 3136, item 37405).
Studio portrait of artists Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo.
Diego Rivera (left) and Frida Kahlo, 1930 or 1931. Photographer unknown. From the San Francisco News-Call Bulletin Photograph Archive (BANC PIC 1959.010–NEG pt.1, box 3135, item 37390).

Chris McDonald
Processing Archivist, Pictorial Unit
Technical Services
The Bancroft Library